Audit
Presenter: Rahmawati
A. Nur Shely F. T.
Sefriatno
Muh.
Dhohir
A.
Definition of
Audit:
According to Arens and Loebbecke (Auditing: An Integrated Approach,
eighth edition, 2000:9), Audit is the activity of collecting and evaluating
evidence about information to determine and report the information to the level
of concordance between the established criteria. Audit process must be
performed by a competent and independent person.
According to The American Accounting Association's Committee on
Basic Auditing Concepts (Auditing: Theory And Practice, 9 edition, 2001:1-2)
audit is a systematic process for obtaining and evaluating evidence objectively
about the state of economic activity and events with the goal of setting umtuk
level of concordance between these statements with established criteria and
communicating the results to interested users.
According to William F. Meisser, Jr. (Auditing and Assurance
Services, A Systematic Approach, 2003:8) audit is a systematic process with the
aim of evaluating the evidence about economic actions and events to ascertain
the level of compatibility between the assignment and the criteria that have
been established, the results of the assignment is communicated to the parties
interested users.
B.
Audit Objectives:
Audit objectives can generally be classified as follows:
1.
Completeness
(Completeness). To
ensure that all transactions are recorded in a journal or there actually have
been included.
2.
Accuracy (accurancy). Transactions and balances to ensure that no estimate has been
recorded at the correct amount, correct calculations, classified, and recorded
appropriately. To ensure that all transactions are recorded on the correct
dates, details of the account balance in accordance with the general ledger
numbers. As well as the sum of the balance has been done properly.
3.
Existence (Existence). To ensure that all assets and liabilities are recorded as the
existence or occurrence of a specific date, so it must be recorded transaction
actually happened and not fictitious.
4.
Rating (Valuation). To ensure that the principles of generally accepted accounting has
been applied correctly.
5.
Classification (Classification). To ensure that the transactions are included in journals
classified appropriately. If related to the balance of the numbers listed
clients have included classified appropriately.
6.
Boundary separation (Cut-Off). To ensure that transactions close to the balance sheet date are
recorded in the proper period. Transactions are likely misstatement is nearing
the end of transactions recorded an accounting period a.
7.
Disclosure (Disclosure). To ensure that the accounts and disclosure requirements related to
fair has been presented and explained in the financial statements with
reasonable contents and footnotes in the report.
C.
Some important things to
note regarding the implementation of this audit, among
others:
1.
The auditor's
understanding of the Audit Object
Objects include the overall audit firm and / or activities that are
managed by the company in
order to achieve its objectives. In the
understanding of object audit, the auditor should obtain information about the
resources (capacity
activity) owned object auditing
in carrying out various activities.
2.
Determination
of the scope and purpose of the
Audit
Audit shows wide scope (area)
of the audit objectives.
3.
Review
of the regulations and policies relating
to the audit object
This study aimed
to obtain information about regulations berhubungaan the audit object is
both general and specifically related to
the various programs / activities are held
on audit objects, so that the auditor can understand
the limits of object audit authority and the various programs
implemented to achieve purpose.
4.
Early in
the development of audit criteria
Criterion is the norm or standard which
is a guide for individuals and groups in
their activities in the company.
5.
Conclusion The
results of the audit
This conclusion is the
basis for determining the
steps to be taken in
the next stage of the audit. The data collected can identify important
issues and problems that
exist and help the auditor determine whether further investigation is
needed.
D. Types of Audit:
1. Operational audits.
Audit in relation to the efficiency and effectiveness of the resources used to
complete the task, as the extent of the practice and procedure relating to the
policy set.
2. Compliance audit.
Audits related to the extent of the law, regulations and other obligations to
external parties concerned.
3. Project management and
change control auditing. Type of audit is formally known as the auditing system
development related to the level of effectiveness efesiensidan various stages of
the development life cycle of existing systems
4. Internal control
audits. Eveluasi brkenaan audit with the internal control structure.
5. Financial audit. Audit
relating to the fairness of the financial statements present the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
6. Fraud audit. Audit
process tracking that leads into the collection of evidence to determine the
possibility of fraud that is going on and to solve the problem by increasing
accountability.
E. Auditor’s Opinion
In an opinion about the fairness of the financial statements, the auditor's
opinion has five kinds of (Muhammad: 2004), namely:
1. Without exception
reasonable opinion
The opinion given by the auditor if there is no limitation in the scope of the audit and there are significant exceptions regarding the fairness and application of generally acceptable accounting principles in the preparation of the financial statements, the consistency of application of accounting principles generally acceptable, as well as adequate disclosures in the financial statements.
The opinion given by the auditor if there is no limitation in the scope of the audit and there are significant exceptions regarding the fairness and application of generally acceptable accounting principles in the preparation of the financial statements, the consistency of application of accounting principles generally acceptable, as well as adequate disclosures in the financial statements.
2. Unqualified Opinion
with Explanatory Language.
The opinion given by the auditor if there are things that require explanatory language, but still the financial statements present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the client company, and coupled with explanatory language.
The opinion given by the auditor if there are things that require explanatory language, but still the financial statements present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the client company, and coupled with explanatory language.
3. Reasonable Opinion by Expection
The opinion given by the auditor if: the client is limited by the scope of the audit, the auditor can not perform audit procedures to obtain important or not important information because the conditions are beyond the power of the client and the auditor, the financial statements are not prepared on generally acceptable accounting principles, accounting berteriama commonly used in the preparation of the financial statements are not applied consistently.
The opinion given by the auditor if: the client is limited by the scope of the audit, the auditor can not perform audit procedures to obtain important or not important information because the conditions are beyond the power of the client and the auditor, the financial statements are not prepared on generally acceptable accounting principles, accounting berteriama commonly used in the preparation of the financial statements are not applied consistently.
4. Improper Opinion
This opinion is the opposite of the reasonable opinion without exception. Aukuntan give opinions not fair if the client's financial statements are not prepared on generally acceptable accounting principles that do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of the client company. Auditor to give an opinion if he unreasonably restricted the scope of the audit, so it can not gather sufficient competent evidence to support his opinion. Thus the information presented by the client in the financial statements can not be trusted at all, so it can not be used by users of financial information to make decisions.
This opinion is the opposite of the reasonable opinion without exception. Aukuntan give opinions not fair if the client's financial statements are not prepared on generally acceptable accounting principles that do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows of the client company. Auditor to give an opinion if he unreasonably restricted the scope of the audit, so it can not gather sufficient competent evidence to support his opinion. Thus the information presented by the client in the financial statements can not be trusted at all, so it can not be used by users of financial information to make decisions.
5. Opinion not Give
Opinion
If the auditor does not express an opinion on the audited financial statements, the audit report is called a report without opinion. This is a condition that causes: a limitation of ordinary nature terhaap broad scope of the audit, if the auditor is not independent in relation to the client.
If the auditor does not express an opinion on the audited financial statements, the audit report is called a report without opinion. This is a condition that causes: a limitation of ordinary nature terhaap broad scope of the audit, if the auditor is not independent in relation to the client.
F. Definition of audit
reports:
Audit report is the audit
report that the
auditor's report stating that the
inspection has been carried out in accordance with the norms accountant
examination, accompanied by a fairness opinion regarding the company's financial statements are examined;
kind of reasonable opinion known is
unconditional (unqualified clean), with reasonable
terms (qualified) , refused to give an opinion (adverse), and rejected without
giving any opinion at all (disclaimer).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar